“One Book New Jersey” Catches Fire
By JIM TOSONE
2003
“What if everyone in New Jersey read the same book at the same
time?” This is the question posed on the website of the One Book New Jersey
program. We will soon know the answer. Libraries across the state have selected
Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 for all of us to read. You may recall from
high school that Fahrenheit 451 is about a future in which firemen do
not put out fires; they start them in order to burn books and thereby prevent
people from thinking. What you may not recall from high school is something
called the Law of Unintended Consequences. It provides some clues as to what
might happen when everyone reads the same book at the same time.
Let us start with the fact that our First Lady, Dina Matos
McGreevey, is the official spokesperson for One Book
New Jersey. Suppose she leaves a copy of Fahrenheit
451 on the night table and Governor McGreevey
gets hold of it? This is the same Governor who, one day after a new
open-records law went into effect, signed a sweeping executive order exempting
more than 400 categories of records from the law, including some records from
the governor’s office. Governor McGreevey may read Fahrenheit
451 and think it is a how-to manual. One Book New Jersey will likely help
him in other ways. If everyone is busy reading a book, they will not be reading
a newspaper or watching the news.
The goal of One Book New Jersey
appears worthwhile. Bring people together through literature by encouraging
residents across the state to read the same book and participate in discussions
and other events centered on that book. But what happens to those of us who
commute to New York City? Manhattanites are not reading Fahrenheit 451.
They are reading Chang-Rae Lee’s Native Speaker. (In true New York City
fashion, a dissenting group called the Women’s Agenda is instead reading James
McBride’s The Color of Water.) You know what will happen when the nation’s
First Lady, Laura Bush, finds out that the states are literally not on the same
page. Get ready for One Book America. Sharpen your pencils for the standardized
test which will surely follow each book discussion. Let no couch potato be left
behind. (Tip: if you join a Fahrenheit
451 book discussion, do not try to get away with watching the movie
version. Unlike the book, director Truffaut does not
kill off Clarissa early in the movie—much to the delight of Julie Christie fans
everywhere.)
But One Book America will not be the end of it.
Imagine Europe’s withering criticism when it finds out that we have
unilaterally selected a book for everyone in America to read. France will
certainly have an issue with Fahrenheit 451, unless it is renamed Centigrade
233. The United Nations will probably pass a resolution ordering us to
instead read Iwao Korbori
and Michael H. Glantz’s Central Eurasian Water
Crisis (United Nations University Press). Fortunately, the resolution will
come with no enforcement provisions.
History provides some insight into the One Book program.
During the Cultural Revolution in China, everyone (and I do mean everyone)
was reading the same book at the same time. It was the Little Red Book—Quotations
from Chairman Mao. For 780 weeks it held all 15 positions on the bestseller
list in the Beijing Times Book Review section. I suspect it was the One Book
China program that came up with the slogan “Better Read than Dead.” So much for
culture.
Here is the ultimate irony and unintended consequence of
One Book New Jersey. Fahrenheit 451 is
a book which celebrates the diversity of books and the diversity of ideas. Yet
here is a government program that picks one book for all New Jerseyans to read. I prefer a Many Books New Jersey
program. We all go to the library and each choose the
books that interest us. We share the ones we like with others who we think
might find them of interest. That is a program which has been working well for
over two hundred years.